|
Anti Varroa bottom
board |
HAPPYKEEPER |
Pollen trap |
HAPPYKEEPER tubes bottom board presentation - Jean-Pierre LE PABIC
History
of the tubes bottom board
The TUBES BOTTOM BOARD was invented in 1993 by Marcel Legris, a beekeeper from
Marseille (south of France). At that time, it was discovered that numerous feral
bee colonies survived without any anti-Varroa treatment, and it was believed
that the reason was that a certain amount of Varroa mites fell out of the
cluster to disappear under the colony in places unvisited by the bees. The tubes
bottom board was created to reproduce these conditions.
The Legris design was made with rigid tubes fitted into holes inside the wood on
each side. The tubes were expensive and manufacturing was complicated. The lack
of profitability quickly caused Mr. Legris to abandon this business. Having
bought some of these boards, I personally made careful observations particularly
on Varroa mites infestation, strength of the colonies in spring and honey
production. My discoveries motivated me to research a more economical design for
the board.
This was accomplished in 2002 when I rolled out the new tubes bottom board under
the “HAPPYKEEPER” brand name. The tubes were no longer fitted into holes inside
the wood but instead held by three struts punched from plastic sheets. It then
was possible to use more cost effective polyethylene tubes on which nothing
would stick. The tubes are not rigid or perfect, so a strut must be placed in
the middle to keep them parallel. After four years, a recent development has
compelled me to replace the punched struts with molded struts on the Dadant
10f/Langstroth models. The overall quality of the board is greatly improved.
Advantages
of the tubes bottom board
Beekeepers observations:
Many beekeepers no longer treat, in my case since April 1997. On the other hand, beekeepers who have not dared to stop treatments are not encouraged to do so because their infestation rates do not decrease substantially.
In my personal apiary, infestation rates are around 2 to 3% in spring after a few years without any treatment.
Some beekeepers have reported observing a significant rise in Varroa mite falls immediately after exchanging a mesh board for a tubes board in autumn. The figure of 20 mites per hour was even reported on an extremely infested colony.
Early development of colonies in spring equips bees to produce honey one month sooner in some locations.
The tubes board is clean in spring and does not need to be cleaned every year. If this is not the case, the colony is generally queenless.
Colonies have well withstood extremely low temperatures (-15 °C) in the French mountains for weeks.
| First experiment from January to October 2005 Place: Toulouse (southwest of France; 100 km from the Pyrenees). Number of colonies: ten on tubes boards and ten on mesh boards. Bees: Buckfast Last anti-Varroa treatment: August 2004 |
Brood surface in May: +25% with tubes boards Mean honey harvest in spring : no honey flow Varroa mite falls: +30% with tubes boards Infestation rates in Sept. 2005: Tubes boards: from 1.1% to 8%, 5.5% on average Mesh boards: from 5.4% to 20.1%, 8.9% on average |
| Second experiment from January 2006 to June
2007 Place: Vesoul (east of France, less than 100 km from Switzerland) Number of colonies: ten on tubes boards and ten on mesh boards. Bees: black bees Last anti-Varroa treatment: APIVAR from September to December 2005 |
Brood surface in April: +93% with tubes boards Mean honey harvest in spring: 29 kg with tubes boards; 14 kg with mesh boards. Varroa mite falls: equal between January and August; 3 times higher on tubes boards from September till January. Nearly 5 times higher after replacing a mesh board with a tubes board. Less than half after replacing of a tubes board with a mesh board. Infestation rates in Aug. 2006: tubes boards : from 1.51% to 6,54%, 4.42% on average mesh boards : from 1.69% to 11.62%, 6.13% on average. |
Analysis
In the beginning, the tubes bottom board was designed to simulate the conditions
found in feral colonies surviving without any anti-Varroa treatment in highly
infested environments.
The empirical knowledge led to my conclusion that the reason for its efficiency
was not that Varroa mites were not recycled through contact with bees as is
apparently the case in traditional hives:
A study carried out in the southeast of France showed that mesh boards were not better than full boards to combat Varroa mites, as would be the case if the initial hypothesis was correct.
Several beekeepers have seen that Varroa mite falls dramatically increase quickly when they replaced a mesh board with a tubes board in autumn.
Development of colonies in spring is stronger.
Varroa mite falls considerably increase after September
The first point would show that the initial hypothesis was not
correct. The second point would show that something changed very quickly inside
the hive after replacement of the boards. The only thing that changes that
rapidly is ventilation inside the hive. To control the atmosphere inside a room,
the opening must not be too small (like a full board) otherwise it is impossible
to renew the air effectively. The opening must not be too large either (like a
mesh bottom board), otherwise it is not possible to control the volume of
external air entering the hive. The openings in a tubes bottom board are the
optimum size and are strategically situated to enable ventilating bees to create
the atmosphere perfectly suited for them. Which keeps bees strong enough to
combat Varroa mites and more inclined to raise brood in spring.
Questions
Why do feral colonies remain healthy in highly infested environments ?
The reason could be: when a swarm begins occupying a hole in a tree, bees would
build the combs conforming to the existing openings, in order to be able to
control the atmosphere around brood. It is easy to imagine that the tubes board
works in much the same way.
Why do Varroa mite falls increase after September ?
Several reasons could be considered: diminution of brood; lower temperature,
especially at night; birth of first wintering bees.
Why do treated colonies not have low infestation rates ?
Most chemicals used to combat Varroa mites are also poisonous to bees but the
dose is sub-lethal for them. When infestation rates are high, the Mid Atlantic
Apiculture Research and Extension Consortium advises against using products such
as fluvalinate, coumaphos or amitraze and even oxalic acid as a preventative
against Colony Collapse Disorder. They could therefore also weaken the bees and
make them unable to effectively combat Varroa mites, even when using tubes
boards.
Further studies are needed to answer all these questions.
The HAPPYKEEPER bottom board takes the place of your usual hive floor
|
|
|
![]() the tubes are held together by the struts. |
![]() The gaps between the tubes are 3.5 mm; bees cannot pass through them. |
![]() The illustrated hive is fitted with alternate frames only, enabling us to see how each tube is located exactly underneath a brood frame. |
![]() Hive waste as well as Varroa mites fall through the funnel shaped openings and can be examined under the hive. |
The HAPPYKEEPER bottom board always remains clean and needs no intervention over several years.
![]() The hive should be set about 20 cm above the ground. |
![]() The gaps between the tubes provide for an efficient circulation of air within the hive. |
The bees can expel used air and replace it with fresh air through their fitted floor. The interior atmosphere is thus made optimal for the health and growth of the colony in every season of the year. In the French Mountains, colonies have easily withstood long periods of cold below -10 C.
Some beekeepers have noticed a considerable increase in Varroa mite drop immediately after replacement of an open mesh bottom board with a Happykeeper bottom board. The strictly controlled atmosphere around the cluster makes the bees stronger, healthier, more productive and so better able to get rid of varroa mites. If an infestation rate of 5% or less is found in the Spring, no treatment whatever is needed.
|
![]() At a height of about 8 mm, the entrance needs no further widening in Spring. Robbing is thus practically eliminated in Summer |
A bottom board that is permanently clean, keeping bees fully healthy, and requiring little or no anti-varroa treatment, with low risk of robbing: all these advantages give clear evidence that the HAPPYKEEPER bottom board is "the board we install and forget".
Pollen Trap
![]() HAPPYKEEPER pollen trap accommodates the harvesting of pristine pollen. |
![]() Hive waste is eliminated through the openings between the tubes and cannot mix with the pollen in the basket. Bigger waste like dead bees is evacuated through the drones holes. |
![]() The pollen basket is easily locked with the hole in the angle bracket. Notice the small cylinder to operate the pollen comb. |
![]() The 7 mm high opening prevents mice and other small animals from entering. |
![]() This picture without the small wooden panel above shows the uncomplicated design of the trap. Maintenance is then particularly easy. The pollen comb can be operated from outside to become horizontal and allow free pasage to the bees and vice-versa. |
![]() The pollen trap seen from below: on the right, shows the groove to eliminate rain water which prevents loss of the pollen harvest. Angle brackets make very easy hanging and removal of the basket. Openings between the tubes allow for the passage of even the bigger pollen pellets. |
Download:
Trial Report on the Happykeeper
Bottom Board January 2006 to June 2007 (
PDF file 397 Mo)
Toulouse-Auzeville 2005
trial report (
PDF file 1,228 Mo)
See also the articles in:
The Beekeeper's quarterly - November 2003
Bee Culture Magazine - December 2005
Available from
20, avenue des Acacias F-92500 RUEIL-MALMAISON - FRANCE Tel.: +33 (0)1 47 14 10 52 Email: j-p.lepabic@aist.enst.fr Internet: www.apiculture.com/happykeeper/
|
UK Suppliers:
E H Thorne Beehives Ltd USA Suppliers:
James Vermeer |